art Рейтинг в сообществе: 0.7 | |
Игры Рейтинг в сообществе: 0.3 | |
красивые картинки Рейтинг в сообществе: 0.2 | |
зеленый слоник Рейтинг в сообществе: 0.1 | |
гиф анимация Рейтинг в сообществе: 0.1 | |
Marvel Рейтинг в сообществе: 0.0 | |
политика Рейтинг в сообществе: 0.0 |
Постов: 9
- хороших: 1
- лучших: 0
Комментариев: 545
When you say "this is her/she," you are not implying the word "speaking." In fact what you are doing is equating yourself to the person for whom the caller is asking. If the caller is asking for Sarah, one could accomplish the same thing by saying "I am Sarah." But instead you are replacing the word "I" with "this" and "Sarah" with the nominative pronoun, in this case "she."
If you still don't buy it, take latin for example (in latin, the rules about which words go in which cases (nominative/accusative/etc) are about smack-on to our own, but they are easier to see because of case endings.) In latin, Sarah would say "ego sum sara" or "I am sarah", and the same grammatical markings would appear on "haec est ea" or "this is she."
When you say "this is her/she," you are not implying the word "speaking." In fact what you are doing is equating yourself to the person for whom the caller is asking. If the caller is asking for Sarah, one could accomplish the same thing by saying "I am Sarah." But instead you are replacing the word "I" with "this" and "Sarah" with the nominative pronoun, in this case "she."
If you still don't buy it, take latin for example (in latin, the rules about which words go in which cases (nominative/accusative/etc) are about smack-on to our own, but they are easier to see because of case endings.) In latin, Sarah would say "ego sum sara" or "I am sarah", and the same grammatical markings would appear on "haec est ea" or "this is she."
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080809104446AAwsWTM -держи и не благодари